Pharmacoeconomic analysis of liposomal amphotericin B versus voriconazole for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia.

Search TravelDoctorOnline

Authors: Collins CD,Stuntebeck ER,DePestel DD,Stevenson JG,
Address: Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0008, USA. cdcollin@umich.edu
Journal: Clin Drug Investig.


Publication: 2007;27(4):233-41.

abstract

BACKGROUND:

liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) has demonstrated similar efficacy to conventional amphotericin B for antifungal treatment in patients with febrile neutropenia; however, it is not without toxicities and is associated with a high acquisition cost. Despite this high cost, LAmB has been shown to have a Pharmacoeconomic advantage over less expensive agents. voriconazole is a potential alternative for empirical antifungal treatment of febrile neutropenia. The objective of this study was to assess the economic outcomes of voriconazole versus LAmB in patients with fever and neutropenia.

METHODS:

A decision analytical model was developed from a hospital perspective based on a 2-year (2002-2003) review of outcomes and prescribing practices in febrile neutropenic patients at a tertiary care medical centre. Literature reports and expert opinion were used to further populate the model. Sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulation enhanced the robustness of the model through variation of all probabilities and costs that populated the model.

RESULTS:

Sixty-three cases were evaluated in the retrospective review. Thirty-two were initially given voriconazole and 31 were given LAmB. Patient demographic data were similar in each group. In the base case, patients initially given voriconazole displayed a 27% reduction in overall treatment cost over patients initially given LAmB (14,950 vs 20,591 $US). Sensitivity analysis determined that the cost advantage in the voriconazole arm was maintained over a wide range of costs and probabilities. Variance in the cost of nephrotoxicity and medication cost did not significantly alter results. Monte Carlo simulation determined the voriconazole arm to be the optimal path in 65% of cases.

CONCLUSION:

The decision model indicated that use of voriconazole as the preferred antifungal agent in adult haematology patients with febrile neutropenia should result in lower overall treatment costs relative to LAmB.



Related Articles
Cost-effectiveness evaluation of voriconazole versus liposomal amphotericin B as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia in Australia.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009
Cost-effectiveness evaluation of voriconazole versus liposomal amphotericin B as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia in Australia.
Al-Badriyeh D, Liew D, Stewart K, Kong DC. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Jan; 63(1):197-208. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
Institutional experience with voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenia.
Pharmacotherapy. 2007
Institutional experience with voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenia.
Shehab N, DePestel DD, Mackler ER, Collins CD, Welch K, Erba HP. Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Jul; 27(7):970-9.
Economic impact of caspofungin as compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in febrile neutropenia in Australia.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009
Economic impact of caspofungin as compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in febrile neutropenia in Australia.
Al-Badriyeh D, Liew D, Stewart K, Kong DC. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Jun; 63(6):1276-85. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
Review Liposomal amphotericin B: a review of its use as empirical therapy in febrile neutropenia and in the treatment of invasive fungal infections.
Drugs. 2009
Review Liposomal amphotericin B: a review of its use as empirical therapy in febrile neutropenia and in the treatment of invasive fungal infections.
Moen MD, Lyseng-Williamson KA, Scott LJ. Drugs. 2009; 69(3):361-92.
Review Liposomal amphotericin B versus conventional amphotericin B in the empirical treatment of persistently febrile neutropenic patients.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002
Review Liposomal amphotericin B versus conventional amphotericin B in the empirical treatment of persistently febrile neutropenic patients.
Cagnoni PJ. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002 Feb; 49 Suppl 1:81-6.

To top Home


Show map | Diseases | Vaccination | Chronic disease | Medicine | Pregnancy | Heat & Sunburn | Cold | Security | Useful tips | Faq | News

TraveldoctorOnline 2001 • Disclaimer webmaster

The contents within traveldoctoronline are presented only for informational purposes and cannot substitute for professional health care or any other medical treatment.All users of this website with health problems should be oblige always to consult their medical doctor before starting any treatment.