Pediatric emergencies on a US-based commercial airline.

Authors:
Address: Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. moore.brian@mayo.edu
Journal:

Publication:

abstract

OBJECTIVES:

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the incidence and character of Pediatric emergencies on a US-based commercial airline and to evaluate current in-flight medical kits.

METHODS:

In-flight consultations to a major US airline by a member of our staff are recorded in an institutional database. In this observational retrospective review, the database was queried for consultations for all passengers up to 18 years old between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2002. Consultations were reviewed for type of emergency, use of the medical kit, and unscheduled landings.

RESULTS:

Two hundred twenty-two pediatric consultations were identified, representing 1 pediatric call per 20,775 flights. The mean age of patients was 6.8 years. Fifty-three emergencies were preflight calls, and 169 were in-flight pediatric consultations. The most common in-flight consultations concerned infectious disease (45 calls, 27%), neurological (25 calls, 15%), and respiratory tract (22 calls, 13%) emergencies. The emergency medical kit was used for 60 emergencies. Nineteen consultations (11%) resulted in flight diversions (1/240,000 flights), most commonly because of in-flight neurological (9) and respiratory tract (5) emergencies. International flights had a higher incidence than domestic flights of consultations and diversions for pediatric emergencies.

CONCLUSIONS:

The most common in-flight pediatric emergencies involved infectious diseases and neurological and respiratory tract problems. Emergency medical kits should be expanded to include pediatric medications.

Related Articles
Clinic in the air? A retrospective study of medical emergency calls from a major international airline.
J Travel Med. 2008
Clinic in the air? A retrospective study of medical emergency calls from a major international airline.
Baltsezak S. J Travel Med. 2008 Nov-Dec; 15(6):391-4.
Review Is there a neurologist on this flight?
Neurology. 2002
Review Is there a neurologist on this flight?
Sirven JI, Claypool DW, Sahs KL, Wingerchuk DM, Bortz JJ, Drazkowski J, Caselli R, Zanick D. Neurology. 2002 Jun 25; 58(12):1739-44.
Medical emergencies at a major international airport: in-flight symptoms and ground-based follow-up.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2002
Medical emergencies at a major international airport: in-flight symptoms and ground-based follow-up.
Chan SB, Hogan TM, Silva JC. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2002 Oct; 73(10):1021-4.
Flight diversions due to onboard medical emergencies on an international commercial airline.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2010
Flight diversions due to onboard medical emergencies on an international commercial airline.
Valani R, Cornacchia M, Kube D. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2010 Nov; 81(11):1037-40.
Review [Air transport, aeronautic medicine, health].
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2009
Review [Air transport, aeronautic medicine, health].
Cupa M. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2009 Oct; 193(7):1619-30; discussion 1630-1.
Surgical and medical emergencies on board European aircraft: a retrospective study of 10189 cases.
Crit Care. 2009
Surgical and medical emergencies on board European aircraft: a retrospective study of 10189 cases.
Sand M, Bechara FG, Sand D, Mann B. Crit Care. 2009; 13(1):R3. Epub 2009 Jan 20.

To top • Home

TraveldoctorOnline 2001 • Disclaimer • webmaster

The contents within traveldoctoronline are presented only for informational purposes and cannot substitute for professional health care or any other medical treatment.All users of this website with health problems should be oblige always to consult their medical doctor before starting any treatment.