Geographic access to cancer care in the U.S.

Authors: Onega T,Duell EJ,Shi X,Wang D,Demidenko E,Goodman D,
Address: The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, USA. Tracy.L.Onega@dartmouth.edu
Journal: Cancer.


Publication: 2008 Feb 15;112(4):909-18. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23229.

abstract

BACKGROUND:

Although access to cancer care is known to influence patient outcomes, to the authors' knowledge, little is known regarding Geographic access to cancer care, and how it may vary by population characteristics. This study estimated travel time to specialized cancer care settings for the continental U.S. population and calculated per capita oncologist supply.

METHODS:

The closest travel times were estimated using a network analysis of the road distance weighted by travel speeds from the population or geographic centroid of every ZIP area in the continental U.S. to that of the nearest cancer care setting under consideration: National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated Cancer Centers, academic medical centers, and oncologists. Alaska and Hawaii were excluded because travel in these states is often not road-based. Population and geographic characteristics including race/ethnicity, income, education, and region were derived from U.S. Census 2000 data and from rural-urban commuting area classifications. Oncologist supply per 100,000 residents in Hospital Referral Regions (pHRRs) was estimated by region.

RESULTS:

Travel times of <or=1 hour were estimated for 45.2% of the population to the nearest NCI Cancer Center, 69.4% to the nearest academic-based care, and 91.8% to any specialized cancer care. Native Americans, nonurban dwellers, and residents in the South had the longest travel times to the nearest NCI Cancer Center compared with the overall U.S. population (median [interquartile range (IQR)] in minutes: 155 [62-308], 173 [111-257], and 164 [70-272], vs 78 [27-172], respectively). Travel burdens persisted for Native Americans and nonurban populations across all 3 cancer care settings. For all population strata, travel times markedly increased as the degree of cancer care specialization increased. The median oncologist supply for pHRRs was 2.83 per 100,000 individuals.

CONCLUSIONS:

There are population groups with limited access to the most specialized cancer care settings.

Cancer 2008. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.



Related Articles
Effects of residence and race on burden of travel for care: cross sectional analysis of the 2001 US National Household Travel Survey.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007
Effects of residence and race on burden of travel for care: cross sectional analysis of the 2001 US National Household Travel Survey.
Probst JC, Laditka SB, Wang JY, Johnson AO. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Mar 9; 7:40. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
Physical and mental health characteristics of U.S.- and foreign-born adults: United States, 1998-2003.
Adv Data. 2006
Physical and mental health characteristics of U.S.- and foreign-born adults: United States, 1998-2003.
Dey AN, Lucas JW. Adv Data. 2006 Mar 1; (369):1-19.
Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002.
Soc Sci Med. 2008
Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002.
Coughlin SS, Leadbetter S, Richards T, Sabatino SA. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jan; 66(2):260-75. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
Review The geographic distribution of AIDS in the United States: is there a rural epidemic?
J Rural Health. 2000
Review The geographic distribution of AIDS in the United States: is there a rural epidemic?
Steinberg S, Fleming P. J Rural Health. 2000 Winter; 16(1):11-9.
Review ICS-II USA research locations: environmental, dental care delivery system, and population sociodemographic characteristics.
Adv Dent Res. 1997
Review ICS-II USA research locations: environmental, dental care delivery system, and population sociodemographic characteristics.
Reifel NM, Davidson PL, Rana H, Nakazono TT. Adv Dent Res. 1997 May; 11(2):210-6.
Removing barriers to participation in clinical trials, a conceptual framework and retrospective chart review study.
Trials. 2012
Removing barriers to participation in clinical trials, a conceptual framework and retrospective chart review study.
Kanarek NF, Kanarek MS, Olatoye D, Carducci MA. Trials. 2012 Dec 10; 13:237. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening is likely to require more than access to care.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012
Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening is likely to require more than access to care.
Stimpson JP, Pagán JA, Chen LW. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Dec; 31(12):2747-54.
Cancer patients' concerns regarding access to cancer care: perceived impact of waiting times along the diagnosis and treatment journey.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012
Cancer patients' concerns regarding access to cancer care: perceived impact of waiting times along the diagnosis and treatment journey.
Paul C, Carey M, Anderson A, Mackenzie L, Sanson-Fisher R, Courtney R, Clinton-McHarg T. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012 May; 21(3):321-9. Epub 2011 Nov 23.

To top Home


Show map | Diseases | Vaccination | Chronic disease | Medicine | Pregnancy | Heat & Sunburn | Cold | Security | Useful tips | Faq | News

TraveldoctorOnline 2001 • Disclaimer webmaster

The contents within traveldoctoronline are presented only for informational purposes and cannot substitute for professional health care or any other medical treatment.All users of this website with health problems should be oblige always to consult their medical doctor before starting any treatment.