Evaluating the combined effectiveness of influenza control strategies and human preventive behavior.

Authors:
Address: Department of Geography, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America. liangmao@ufl.edu
Journal:


Publication:
Free Text: Evaluating the combined effectiveness of influenza control strategies and human preventive behavior.

abstract

control strategies enforced by health agencies are a major type of practice to contain influenza outbreaks. Another type of practice is the voluntary preventive behavior of individuals, such as receiving vaccination, taking antiviral drugs, and wearing face masks. These two types of practices take effects concurrently in influenza containment, but little attention has been paid to their combined effectiveness. This article estimates this combined effectiveness using established simulation models in the urbanized area of Buffalo, NY, USA. Three control strategies are investigated, including: Targeted Antiviral Prophylaxis (TAP), workplace/school closure, community travel restriction, as well as the combination of the three. All control strategies are simulated with and without regard to individual preventive behavior, and the resulting effectiveness are compared. The simulation outcomes suggest that weaker control strategies could suffice to contain influenza epidemics, because individuals voluntarily adopt preventive behavior, rendering these weaker strategies more effective than would otherwise have been expected. The preventive behavior of individuals could save medical resources for control strategies and avoid unnecessary socio-economic interruptions. This research adds a human behavioral dimension into the simulation of control strategies and offers new insights into disease containment. Health policy makers are recommended to review current control strategies and comprehend preventive behavior patterns of local populations before making decisions on influenza containment.



Related Articles
Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic.
Nature. 2006
Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic.
Ferguson NM, Cummings DA, Fraser C, Cajka JC, Cooley PC, Burke DS. Nature. 2006 Jul 27; 442(7101):448-52. Epub 2006 Apr 26.
A small community model for the transmission of infectious diseases: comparison of school closure as an intervention in individual-based models of an influenza pandemic.
PLoS One. 2008
A small community model for the transmission of infectious diseases: comparison of school closure as an intervention in individual-based models of an influenza pandemic.
Milne GJ, Kelso JK, Kelly HA, Huband ST, McVernon J. PLoS One. 2008; 3(12):e4005. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
Developing guidelines for school closure interventions to be used during a future influenza pandemic.
BMC Infect Dis. 2010
Developing guidelines for school closure interventions to be used during a future influenza pandemic.
Halder N, Kelso JK, Milne GJ. BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Jul 27; 10:221. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
Review Combination strategies for pandemic influenza response - a systematic review of mathematical modeling studies.
BMC Med. 2009
Review Combination strategies for pandemic influenza response - a systematic review of mathematical modeling studies.
Lee VJ, Lye DC, Wilder-Smith A. BMC Med. 2009 Dec 10; 7:76. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
Review The risk of seasonal and pandemic influenza: prospects for control.
Clin Infect Dis. 2009
Review The risk of seasonal and pandemic influenza: prospects for control.
Monto AS. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jan 1; 48 Suppl 1:S20-5.

To top Home


Show map | Diseases | Vaccination | Chronic disease | Medicine | Pregnancy | Heat & Sunburn | Cold | Security | Useful tips | Faq | News

TraveldoctorOnline 2001 • Disclaimer webmaster

The contents within traveldoctoronline are presented only for informational purposes and cannot substitute for professional health care or any other medical treatment.All users of this website with health problems should be oblige always to consult their medical doctor before starting any treatment.